Dr. C. Scott Ananian (cananian) wrote,
Dr. C. Scott Ananian
cananian

More Diebold commentary.

This thread on Indymedia has more good information on what exactly is in those Diebold memos, and why it is so incriminating. In particular, how easy it is to alter the vote log, and who does it -- from the memos:
Being able to end-run the database has admittedly got people out of a bind though. Jane (I think it was Jane) did some fancy footwork on the .mdb file in Gaston recently. I know our dealers do it. King County is famous for it. That's why we've never put a password on the file before.
Also, the indymedia commenter notes:
Then, bear in mind that GEMS programs 1.11.14 and 1.17.17 are certified -- and check out how many times they are installing 1.14.xx and 1.15.xx series and using them in elections! (Totally illegal: what this means is the software used in these elections was never looked at by ANYONE except a handful of programmers in Canada.) Pretty much throws the whole certification and testing argument out the window.
Ok, that's my last "democracy dying" post for the day. (More are definitely in the future, unfortunately.)
Tags: diebold, elections
Subscribe

  • Diebold Whines Again

    It's fair to say I'm not a big fan of Diebold -- even before they sent me a cease-and-desist letter over my small part in exposing some of their…

  • Election Update

    Some quick links: a list of some of the major irregularities reported in the 2004 election along with a discussion and partial debunking (it's…

  • Disgusted.

    Where would Red Sox fans be if the team had acknowledged the statistical improbability of going on to win the next 8 games in a row---and conceded?…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments