Kyle said the state would inventory the systems of other vendors and other counties once the Diebold investigation was complete. The state will also begin requiring all counties to maintain and submit logs of the hardware, firmware and software versions they use.This is all very good news! [Not good that these insecure manipulatable systems were installed and used in the first place, but good that the situation is now being addressed, at least.]
Starting in 2004, the state will also conduct random audits of voting systems to ensure that all software and hardware is certified. And in the future, the state will require CEOs of vendors to affirm under penalty of perjury that the company will not change systems without obtaining written approval from the secretary of state. Failure to do so may result in de-certification and possible criminal charges, Kyle said.
A company found violating election laws or regulations, he said, could be disbarred from certifying new equipment with the state for one year.
Kyle said the secretary of state would be announcing further proposals regarding e-voting in the near future.
It's widely believed by voting machine makers that Secretary of State Shelley, who has previously stated his preference for electronic voting machines to offer a voter-verifiable receipt with their machines, may announce plans within a week or so to require this on voting machines used in the state.
A voter receipt would allow voters to verify that their ballot has been cast correctly before depositing the receipt into a secure ballot box to be used in case of a recount.
Joseph Holder writes more about the serious security problems found with the Diebold Alameda installation. He also speculates that we might be seeing the true explanation for the -16,022 Gore votes in the 2000 Presidential election, originally speculated to be due to an unauthorized "second memory card".