Previous Entry Share Next Entry
A game to think about.
My family has a nice shut the box set at home. They play with the rules variation where the final score is the digits left uncovered, read in order -- ie, if 1, 5, and 9 are left uncovered, the score is 159 (some variants instead use the sum of the digits as the score), and you must roll two dice unless the sum of the uncovered digits is 6 or less, in which case you must roll only one die (some variants make this a free choice). In a two player game, both players put a dollar in the pot and then the first player attempts to shut the box; if he fails the second player starts from scratch and tries to shut the box; if they both fail, the winner is the player with the lower score. If the game ends by shutting the box, the winner gets the $2 in the pot and an extra dollar from the other player (double the stake); otherwise the winner just gets the pot.

An easy question: is this a fair game? If not, who is the sucker?

A hard question: what's the best "short" strategy for playing the game? (I'll define a "short" strategy as "capable of being described on a single side of a sheet of paper.)

Answers in a future post...

  • 1
The first player has the advantage that if both players shut the box, the first player wins. But the second player has the advantage that he knows what score he needs to beat to win. I haven't done any calculations, but I'd guess that the second is more important,

  • 1

Log in

No account? Create an account